0
What does Less dependence on begging and more power in bargaining mean?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Begging means that you want something for free, and are asking the person to give up something for free, with nothing in return for it. Bargaining means that you may own something of value, perhaps an item or labor (work), or money, and want something in return. Usually bargaining involves one person saying I have this to offer, and the other says I have this to offer, and you aim to make a trade of both, that is equal in value to each other, that is satisfactory to both. Begging is free on one side, and bargaining is an attempt to trade one thing of value for another thing of value. Bargaining can be lopsided, and oftentimes, one is begging the other to trade. Given that context, it is possible for one to beg someone to take your bargain, which could be either considered agggressive or submissive, if it is used as a marketing strategy. Generally speaking, begging is frowned upon in society, and as a marketing strategy, but it works. People that beg elicit sympathy from their society, and often times get it.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What relationship in which a less developed nation trade is controlled by a developed nation?
economic dependence :)
What are the three things you would do to change the world?
Lessen our dependence on fossil fuels Less homework More chocolate
What are the benefits of hydrogen cars?
Some benefits of hydrogen vehicles are: less pollution, less dependence on foreign oil, less vehicle costs, and not having to purchase gasoline. These vehicles are great for the environment.
What is productivity bargaining?
A form of collective bargaining leading to a productivity agreement in which management offers a pay raise in exchange for alterations to employee working practices designed to increase productivity Productivity bargaining has been described as "an agreement in which advantages of one kind or another, such as higher wages or increased leisure, are given to workers in return for agreement on their part to accept changes in working practices or in methods or in organization of work which will lead to more efficient working. The changes in the interests of efficiency are seen as an integral part of the bargaining and as necessary contribution to meeting the cost of advantages conceded to the workers." The prime purpose of productivity bargaining is to raise labour productivity and lower unit labour costs, and this is achieved by the exchange of alternations in working practices for increased leisure, higher remuneration for labour, more comprehensive fringe benefits, and general increase in the status of manual employees. Moreover, it is an exercise in problem solving and creating new gains, rather than just power bargaining over shares. Productivity bargaining is a complex process. It involves lengthy, detailed negotiations about the implementation of a variety of management techniques such as work study and job evaluation. The content of negotiations is more or less comprehensive in the sense that it includes not only bargaining over earnings but bargaining over other related matters such as reductions in hours, introduction or extension of shift working, manning of machines, demarcation lines, the introduction of new payment system, and re-allocation of job control. In addition, the coverage of productivity bargaining is more or less comprehensive in that generally speaking it will aply to all employees in an enterprise. Productivity bargaining generally occurs at the level of the enterprise or company.
What is product Bargaining?
A form of collective bargaining leading to a productivity agreement in which management offers a pay raise in exchange for alterations to employee working practices designed to increase productivity Productivity bargaining has been described as "an agreement in which advantages of one kind or another, such as higher wages or increased leisure, are given to workers in return for agreement on their part to accept changes in working practices or in methods or in organization of work which will lead to more efficient working. The changes in the interests of efficiency are seen as an integral part of the bargaining and as necessary contribution to meeting the cost of advantages conceded to the workers." The prime purpose of productivity bargaining is to raise labour productivity and lower unit labour costs, and this is achieved by the exchange of alternations in working practices for increased leisure, higher remuneration for labour, more comprehensive fringe benefits, and general increase in the status of manual employees. Moreover, it is an exercise in problem solving and creating new gains, rather than just power bargaining over shares. Productivity bargaining is a complex process. It involves lengthy, detailed negotiations about the implementation of a variety of management techniques such as work study and job evaluation. The content of negotiations is more or less comprehensive in the sense that it includes not only bargaining over earnings but bargaining over other related matters such as reductions in hours, introduction or extension of shift working, manning of machines, demarcation lines, the introduction of new payment system, and re-allocation of job control. In addition, the coverage of productivity bargaining is more or less comprehensive in that generally speaking it will aply to all employees in an enterprise. Productivity bargaining generally occurs at the level of the enterprise or company.
How did president George W. Bush react to us anxiety about oil?
He pledged to work for less US dependence on foreign oil.
How did their dependence on British trade affect the opinions of Americans in the East and North regarding the War of 1812?
less supportive of the war of 1812
Why are employers less likely to approve coalition bargaining than unions are to approve multiemployer bargaining?
Employers are less likely to approve coalition bargaining because it tends to equalized the affected unions' benefits - hence bargaining strength. For example, a union which historically has not negotiated top-notched wages and benefits for particular class of employees will now be aligned with a union which has historically done so for the same class of employees. The net result would be higher operating expenses for the employers who most assuredly would have to equalized the wages and benefits as a starting point to negotiations. By contrast, unions would more likely approve of multiemployer bargaining because the unions (which have finite resources) would expend less time and money because of the lack of overall time spent at the bargaining table. The unions would therefore be free to use the resulting time and cost savings for other union purposes, such as pending arbitrations and mediations. Also, employers would also disfavor multiemployer bargaining because of the danger of trade secrets being revealed to its competitors during the negotiation process. By: Troy Horton, Esq.
Why the power shared by diesel power plant is less?
why the power shared by diesel plant is less
How bad is tramadol?
Tramadol is less likely to cause constipation than other opioid painkillers. Like other opioids, their is a risk of dependence.
What are the advantages of using electricity for lights and other electrical equipment only when they are needed?
You pay for the power that you use. The less power you use the less you pay. You pay for the power that you use. The less power you use the less you pay.
What are the advantages of using electricity for light and other electrical equipment only when they are needed?
You pay for the power that you use. The less power you use the less you pay. You pay for the power that you use. The less power you use the less you pay.
