The President is not totally clueless about finances. He knows that the trillion dollar a year deficits can not continue forever and he is not interested in any serious cuts in social programs or reductions in government size, so revenue obviously must be increased. If any cuts are made, some other new tax must replace it. Of course, the President has only limited power over tax cuts or increases. He says he would like to raise the income tax on the highest bracket of income and has threatened to veto an extension of the so-called "Bush" tax cuts if they include the top bracket. Unless Congress could over-ride such a veto, a large tax increase would occur at all levels, so what he would actually do is far from certain. He has other ideas about increasing taxes, such as taxing dividends like regular income, increasing the inheritance tax and reducing the home mortgage deduction -- tax cuts are not his focus.
Presidents often try to implement tax cuts (Obama has cut taxes several times since he has been in office). But tax cuts generally cannot be repealed unless congress goes along with it.
OBAmA
Health care. Keeping Bush tax cuts. Tax cuts increase revenue to the government and stimulate the economy.
The debt has grown about 25% during President Obama's administration, due mainly to the recession, the Bush tax cuts and two wars which Obama inherited.
No, they have not; in fact, President Obama gave middle class families two tax cuts during his first term in office.
I WISH I KNEW! NO BODY ANSWERS ME ON HERE!!! :-(
No, not alone. Only congress can repeal the law or write new one. The president can recommend to congress what he wants. The president also can veto the law written by congress or agree and sign it. But it should be noted that President Obama wants to keep some of the Bush tax cuts-- for the middle class especially. But he feels the wealthy do not need another tax cut, when they have already gotten a number of them.
During his first term, he gave two tax cuts that mainly affected middle class Americans and small-business owners. In his second term, he wants to keep the Bush Tax Cuts for 98% of Americans, but allow the tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans (the top 2%) to expire, as he feels they can afford to pay a little bit more.
He says he wants to raise the income tax rate for very high income people. However, he did not veto the extension of the so-called Bush tax cuts when he had his chance.
Tax cuts mean more money to be spent. More money being spent means more money movement in the economy. A higher money movement is inherent in a strong economy, and often necessary.
It was a campaign promise that he made, and he kept it with two tax cuts that mainly benefited the middle class.
In my view, his most damaging compromise was his agreement to retain the Bush tax cuts for households with adjusted gross incomes exceeding $250,000.