make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
A hypothesis.
observation, hypothsis, experimentation. and conclustion
making a prediction
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
it is better at their work
I THINK THE ANSWER IS YOU CAN USE CAUSE AND EFFECT IN YOUR HYPOTHSIS BECAUSE CAUSE IS SOMETHING AND SOMETHING AND SAME WITH EFFECT
hugo de varies
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
by conducting an experiment that will test the Hypothesis
by conducting an experiment that will test the Hypothesis
A hypothesis.
observation, hypothsis, experimentation. and conclustion
Hypotheses are based on theories. If a hypothesis seems incorrect then a scientist knows that she has been mistaken about her understanding of the theory, and that's why she formed the wrong hypothesis to test. Or it might be that she has learned that there are new conditions under which the theory does not hold, and that the theory must be refined. Both of these are useful to scientists.
supported by enough data to become a theory.