Causation is the theory that something routinely occurred; either by normal action (i.e.: the rain falls thereby causing the the street to be wet), or by complete chance (i.e.: your house is hit by a meteorite).
You will have to take this meaning and determine yourself how it might equate to "indirect enrichment."
No. Causation is a legal terminology to determine standards of justice which do not normally exist in nature.
causation was before gravitation and gravitation is relative where as causation is sourced from the first cause..so I would posit that gravitation is the consequence of a subsequent cause
Unjust enrichment means that one party was enriched wrongfully at the expense of another party. While some states do not allow unjust enrichment as a cause of action by itself, states that do, and Federal Law, generally adhere to the requirement that the following factors be proved for a case of unjust enrichment: 1. An enrichment 2. An impoverishment 3. A connection between enrichment and the impoverishment 4. Absence of a justification for the enrichment and impoverishment 5. An absence of a remedy provided by the law
Boyle's Law is an indirect relationship. (Or an inverse)
The direct result of an action
element of tort law. -duty -breach -causation -damages
D. P. Visser has written: 'Daedalus in the Supreme Court' 'Thinking about law' -- subject(s): Law, Jurisprudence, Roman law, History 'Unjustified enrichment' -- subject(s): Unjust enrichment
Douglas Hodgson has written: 'Individual Duty Within a Human Rights Discourse (Applied Legal Philosophy)' 'The law of intervening causation' -- subject(s): Causation, Liability (Law)
A weak governing document is detrimental because it will entail flaws in the providing of the law. It will entail the abuse of law and law of governanace, leading to social unrest, chaos and conflict for everybody.
Horst Heinrich Jakobs has written: 'Magna Glossa' -- subject(s): Medieval Law, Roman law 'Lucrum ex negotiatione' -- subject(s): History, Unjust enrichment, Unjust enrichment (Roman law)
George E. Palmer has written: '2007 Cumulative Supplement No.1 Law of Restitution (Volumes I-IV)' 'Law of Restitution, 2002-2 Cumulative Supplement' 'Mistake and unjust enrichment' -- subject(s): Mistake (Law), Unjust enrichment
The answer would be: It confuses correlation with causation.