0
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What else can I help you with?
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What doesit means if a scientist fails reject a hypothesis?
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the evidence gathered from their experiments or observations was not strong enough to disprove the hypothesis. This does not confirm the hypothesis as true; instead, it suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support an alternative explanation. It is important to note that failing to reject a hypothesis does not provide proof of its validity, and further research may be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What does it mean if an scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the data collected from experiments or observations did not provide sufficient evidence to disprove that hypothesis. This does not necessarily prove the hypothesis to be true; rather, it indicates that there is not enough support to conclude it is false. The results may suggest that further research is needed to explore the hypothesis more thoroughly. Ultimately, the failure to reject a hypothesis is a part of the scientific process and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of scientific theories.
What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What do scientist do after they have tested a hypothesis?
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What does it mean if a scientist can't reject a hypothesis?
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Why did scientist reject wegener's hypothesis?
because he didn't know how the tectonic plates/continents moved
When drawing a conclusion-scientist examine the data to see if it supports or fails to support the hypothesis?
I no
If a researcher fails to reject the null hypothesis and the null hypothesis is not true has the researcher made a correct decision a Type I error or Type II error?
If a researcher fails to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false, they have made a Type II error. This occurs when the researcher incorrectly concludes that there is not enough evidence to support an alternative hypothesis, despite it being true. In contrast, a Type I error happens when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true.
