0
because he didn't know how the tectonic plates/continents moved
What else can I help you with?
What does it a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What do scientist do after they have tested a hypothesis?
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What does it mean if a scientist can't reject a hypothesis?
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Why did scientist reject weeners hypothesis?
Because the caculated strength of rock made such movement of earth's crust seemed impossible.
What evidence did Wegeners have to support his theory?
Fossils support his hypothesis.
What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Why did other scientists not accept Alfred Wegeners theory?
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
What was the reason wegeners continental drift hypothesis was rejected?
His evidence was incorrect.
Is the critical region the values of the test statistics for which the null hypothesis will reject?
The null hypothesis will not reject - it is a hypothesis and is not capable of rejecting anything. The critical region consists of the values of the test statistic where YOU will reject the null hypothesis in favour of the expressed alternative hypothesis.
