0
What else can I help you with?
What does it a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What do scientist do after they have tested a hypothesis?
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What doesit means if a scientist fails reject a hypothesis?
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the evidence gathered from their experiments or observations was not strong enough to disprove the hypothesis. This does not confirm the hypothesis as true; instead, it suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support an alternative explanation. It is important to note that failing to reject a hypothesis does not provide proof of its validity, and further research may be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
What does it mean if a scientist can't reject a hypothesis?
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
What does it mean if an scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the data collected from experiments or observations did not provide sufficient evidence to disprove that hypothesis. This does not necessarily prove the hypothesis to be true; rather, it indicates that there is not enough support to conclude it is false. The results may suggest that further research is needed to explore the hypothesis more thoroughly. Ultimately, the failure to reject a hypothesis is a part of the scientific process and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of scientific theories.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Why did scientist reject wegener's hypothesis?
because he didn't know how the tectonic plates/continents moved
What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Is the critical region the values of the test statistics for which the null hypothesis will reject?
The null hypothesis will not reject - it is a hypothesis and is not capable of rejecting anything. The critical region consists of the values of the test statistic where YOU will reject the null hypothesis in favour of the expressed alternative hypothesis.
When do we reject a hypothesis?
When we've proven that the hypothesis is false !
