This is not an 'easy' one to rationalise; It refers to the fact that some people are prejudiced because of their upbringing; that their feelings are part of their formation as a young child, it is the way that their mind thinks and works and you can not (really) change that in a person.
This is different compared to somebody who has becomeprejudiced later in life; by an event or indoctronation in to a gang or cult.
yes, for many reasond. but, the main reason is religion. woo! you read my anwer!!! (: yes, for many reasond. but, the main reason is religion. woo! you read my anwer!!! (:
Reasoned.
Prejudice means juding something or someone for no reason
If someone has got generalized anxiety disorder then they will show it by basically being stressed and anxious without any clear reason. They tend to find problems with everything and cannot be reasoned out of it.
Reason is a word by itself and cannot be broken down to word + suffix. The suffix -able can be added to it to form the word 'reasonable'.
The correct spelling is "prejudice." It refers to preconceived opinions that are not based on reason or actual experience.
its because you are white.
Plaintiffs do not charge. They file lawsuits. The plaintiff can always file, but if the case is dismissed with prejudice, a new filing cannot be litigated. If a case is dismissed with prejudice, it means res judicata applies, and a new filing would be dismissed because the issues have already been litigated. If the case is dismissed without prejudice, it means that it has been voluntarily dismissed or dismissed for some reason to allow the case to be refiled and re-litigated later.
It means that for some legal reason the court has dismissed the charges against the individual. A case may be dismissed "with prejudice" or "without prejudice."
Check the court records from '07. It depends on how the dismissal was worded. If it was 'Dismissed WITH Prejudice,' then it cannot be pursued in court again. If it was 'Disimissed WITHOUT Prejudice,' then it can be resurrected and brought to suit once again.
woopdidoo
This can be derived from Neton's Second Law. Therefore, he may have reasoned that a force is required to accelerate a mass.