It is a great thing if a company is observing a moratorium on animal testing. This means that they are not testing on animals.
Yes, many animal byproducts are used within cosmetics and animals are routinely tested upon - even if a company claims not to support animal testing, they may use research based on animal testing by other companies or be owned by a parent company who use animal testing. Proctor & Gamble are the worst for this, they not only use animal testing but have supported grossly unethical animal testing and outright torment animals - aka Huntington Life Sciences.
If on the packaging of a product (like the ones you mentioned and others as well) does not say "No animal testing" or something of the sort, they do not. But if they don't say anything about animal testing, they probably do animal testing. I would research it before supporting a company that might do animal testing.
No, the company does not. Himalaya is highly against all testing of all animals. None of the products has ever or will ever be tested on animals.
alot of things are done in animal testing like makup house products and many more but the must makup comapny use's animal tessting is l'Oreal company in Paris
no it is not as bad then animal testing
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Yes, animal testing is around the whole world !
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
zoologist might answer questions by observing the animal's habitat, skin, and bones.
well if the testing is from animal haters the animal will die but if they are good it will live......
No, the PUIG company does not perform animal tests for their products. This company also claims they do not work with other companies who perform animals testing.
if you believe in animal testing...you have no morals,,,i no this because i just wrote a 5 page paper on animal testing and its horrid