It means that they were great out in the field fighting batles. but when it came to looking after the organisation of their newly conquered land they were not very good.
Most of the Mongol leaders did a better job on taking over land and resources than forming an effective government.
Better tacticts and leaders
They had a drive to fight, they knew the land (the South), and they had a better trained army. They had cotton, a profitable crop, and better military leaders
they had better weapons and clever leaders. they would have stronger men too
wireless communications
Most of the Mongol leaders did a better job on taking over land and resources than forming an effective government.
Temujin is better known as Genghis Khan, and he was a Mongol Emperor during the early 13th century. He started the Mongol invasions of China and was a key figure in the expansion of the Mongol Empire.
genocide
Women leaders are not bad because anything that boys do girls can do better. Women leaders are gr8 and don't you forget it!! - Jennifer Austin
Too many to list. You would be better off asking which countries have had female leaders.
It was a southern advantage.
That depends on what role you are more comfortable with.
Better tacticts and leaders
For better trade
No. It would be very different, though. It would be better if more world leaders were women, but the less diverse a group, the more likely it is to have problems.
In order to better control the leaders of their conquests in the New World, the Spanish government created a feudal system. Members of a tribe were treated as slaves after the leaders were captured and taken hostage by the Spaniards.
To better educate the leaders of the world on fitness.