The mean is called a non-resistant measure in statistics.
It must be "mutually exclusive" since "non mutually" does not even mean anything!
No. The average of the deviations, or mean deviation, will always be zero. The standard deviation is the average squared deviation which is usually non-zero.
It is likely to mean deterministic. It means that the outcome of an event is known and not subject to probability.It is likely to mean deterministic. It means that the outcome of an event is known and not subject to probability.It is likely to mean deterministic. It means that the outcome of an event is known and not subject to probability.It is likely to mean deterministic. It means that the outcome of an event is known and not subject to probability.
Always the non hypothesis that is, it is unable to address a specific, unmeasurable, and non answerable question. Based on that non hypothesis is: Too Complex, Imprecise, Misdirected to Researcher,Statements of the Obvious, Global Statements.
please tell me what are the non test instruments like anecdotal records, inventory and others.
The expression anecdotal evidence refers to evidence from anecdotes. Because of the small sample, there is a larger chance that it may be unreliable due to cherry-picked or otherwise non-representative samples of typical cases. Anecdotal evidence is considered dubious support of a claim; it is accepted only in lieu of more solid evidence. This is true regardless of the veracity of individual claims.
anecdotal
There doesn't seem to be an opposite to anecdotes. An anecdote is a "small" story that proves a point (i.e. anecdotal evidence). So the opposite is either a "large" story or evidence that is not anecdotal. Of course, an anecdotal story could be a rather long story and a "yarn" or a "tale" could be a rather short story. Certainly, a tale would be hard pressed to be a tale if it was a real short story. However, there are such things as long-winded anecdotes. Science seems to want to make the distinction clearer. Anecdotes are supposedly "non-scientific", which is rather odd to me. Does that mean that a tale, such as a non-fiction book, is not scientific. I mean it is possible to have a book that is nothing but anecdotes, but proves its point to a greater degree then using some scientific method, no? Not surprisingly, in the legal world "anecdotal" evidence can be very persuasive: more persuasive then scientific methods. Yes, I think when people are just chatting to prove some point and they use some anecdote do prove their point they might want to remind the person listening by saying "well, this is just anecdotal evidence". But usually the point has already been made. That's my non-anecdotal and non-scientific take anyways.
To refer to another event as proof of the existence of a fact
The adverb form of the adjective "anecdotal" is "anecdotally".
An anecdotal experience is one that you have had that was interesting or amusing. You may tell someone about an anecdotal experience to illustrate a point.
The noun form of the adjective anecdotal is anecdote, which means a short amusing or interesting personal story. It comes from the greek anecdote (Ἀνέκδοτα), meaning unpublished or "not given out".
Anecdotal Evidence - 2009 was released on: USA: 2009
Pertaining to, or abounding with, anecdotes; as, anecdotal conversation.
The professor used anecdotal examples and allegorical stories to teach the class. Something that is anecdotal contains an anecdote: a brief story, usually relaying some personal account or event.
An anecdotal record should contain all of the following EXCEPT