pendejo
The Public treated them like heroes and they were well paid, assuming they weren't prisoners of war.
The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.
Well, when considering the often cruelty bestowed upon even the sucessfulest members of roman society, many would consider the treatment of roman soldiers to be relatively good. They recieved ample food and resources and did still gain enough 'renewable' resources from the tribal villages they often invaded. As far as pay goes, the blood of their victims was more then enough.
In Roman times Hibernia was Ireland. The Romans were very well aware of its presence, but did not expand there. However they succeeded in pushing the remnants of the Druids to Hibernia.
They were not treated well. The were forced to Hoovervilles.
well it was very hard to be a roman
Rottweilers are not inherently mean. It all depends on how they are raised and how they are treated. Any dog can be mean if it is treated poorly just as any dog can be friendly if it is treated well.
Do you mean Hermes? Well, his roman name is Mercury.
The Public treated them like heroes and they were well paid, assuming they weren't prisoners of war.
Well, the first firefighters were Romans, so amusingly in Roman times. If you mean a modern one, please specify your question.
The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.The Roman emperor who was especially harsh to Christians would have to be Diocletian as he initiated the "great persecution" which lasted the longest.
Well they were treated like workers they usually worked but if they were lucky they got time to play roman games!
well her husben cheated on he like 1000 times so no.
They weren't treated very well. All that most people wanted was money, they didn't care about their animals. Horses especially weren't treated well. Other animals just got fed for the slaughter house.
The phrase means that the person is treated extremely well and in the same manner as you would treat a royal.
She treated them according to class for example the poor were treated badly and the wealthy were treated well. The magna Carta was not signed for Victoria even if it was offered many times
It is an adverb. It can mean "in a fair manner" (He was treated fairly). It can mean "somewhat" (He does his job fairly well).