0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was World War 1 largely a static war?
It was static because both sides were evenly matched, neither had the resources to make a prolonged offensive, and so the war become a war of attrition, and the Allies one due to the blockade imposed on Germany, thus they cracked before the Allies did. (It was only static on the Western Fronts, i.e. France/Belgium and Northern Italy etc.)
What is The war of attrition's relation to ww1?
A war of attrition, in general, is a war with high casualities but little territorial gain. The most famous war of attrition is the conflict on the Western Front in France during World War I.
Who won the War of Attrition?
The " War of Attrition" is not a war that can be won by either side. The War of Attrition is a battle strategy in which the side on the offensive, launches several non-stop advances in hopes of wearing down the enemy (causing fatigue, running out of ammo, men or supplies etc.)
Why was war of attrition important?
World War II was called the War of Attrition because by its definition it required that it was fought defensively meaning not fought on American soil. This means that there was little damage to the US.
What is attrition of war in the US Civil War?
The term in military science is "War of Attrition". A war of attrition occurs when neither side has the strength or competency to defeat the other quickly and decisively in what is known as a "coup de main" Both sides fight it out over a period of time taking losses and using material. In a war of attrition the side with the most manpower and weapons wins but with losses equal to or greater then the weaker side. This is true of the American Civil War in general and the Seige of Petersburg in particular.
Situation where each side in a war tries to wear down the other by constant attacks?
war of attrition
What sentence can you make with the word attrition?
It was a war of attrition.
Why was World War 1 largely a static war?
It was static because both sides were evenly matched, neither had the resources to make a prolonged offensive, and so the war become a war of attrition, and the Allies one due to the blockade imposed on Germany, thus they cracked before the Allies did. (It was only static on the Western Fronts, i.e. France/Belgium and Northern Italy etc.)
When was War of Attrition - album - created?
War of Attrition - album - was created on 2007-03-06.
What is The war of attrition's relation to ww1?
A war of attrition, in general, is a war with high casualities but little territorial gain. The most famous war of attrition is the conflict on the Western Front in France during World War I.
What is wearing down the enemy also called?
Attrition is a general term for wearing down the enemy. Battles of attrition generally last a last a long time and tests a combatants resolve to stay in the fight.Examples include:Trench warfare in World War 1 (for example Somme, Verdun)Static warfare in World War 2 (Stalingrad)
If the cold war was not actually a war then what was it?
It was attritional or a 'War of Attrition' .
Explian what a war attrition mean?
Vietnam was a war of attrition. Kill as many communists as possible. The communists in turn, will try to do the same to us. He that kills the most wins the war. The measuring device was the "Body Count." The tactic used was "Search and Destroy." Vietnam War: 1. Strategy-Attrition 2. Tactics-Search and Destroy 3. Result (add em up)-Body Count
Who won the War of Attrition?
The " War of Attrition" is not a war that can be won by either side. The War of Attrition is a battle strategy in which the side on the offensive, launches several non-stop advances in hopes of wearing down the enemy (causing fatigue, running out of ammo, men or supplies etc.)
What is the war called when a country go all out?
War of total attrition
What is the definition of War of Attrition?
My butt!! haahhahahahhahah lola
Why was war of attrition important?
World War II was called the War of Attrition because by its definition it required that it was fought defensively meaning not fought on American soil. This means that there was little damage to the US.
