The author supports the argument in favor of National Health Insurance (NHI) by providing data and evidence showing that countries with universal healthcare systems have better healthcare outcomes and lower costs compared to the United States. Additionally, the author may also highlight the moral imperative of ensuring that all citizens have access to healthcare regardless of their financial situation.
The key to all arguments is having logical information and facts. This will make it easier to present your case in opposition or in favor of the argument.
"Getting behind an idea" means to support or endorse that idea. It suggests that you are in favor of the concept and are willing to help it succeed.
A persuasive statement that seeks to convince readers often presents a clear problem, acknowledges opposing views, and offers a strong argument in favor of the writer's position. By addressing counterarguments and presenting evidence to support the main point, the statement aims to persuade readers to agree with the writer's perspective.
To support or approve of something means to agree with, endorse, or show approval for that particular thing. It implies that one is in favor of it and believes it is the right course of action or decision.
A counterargument is used in persuasive writing to acknowledge and address potential objections or opposing viewpoints. By presenting and refuting counterarguments, the writer can strengthen their own argument by showing that they have considered different perspectives and can still argue in favor of their position. This can make the overall argument more convincing to the audience.
What part of the constitution could he have drawn upon to support his argument
What part of the constitution could he have drawn upon to support his argument
Which statement reflects an accurate argument in favor of a command economy
Thomas Edwards has written: 'The argument in favor of Christianity drawn from the character and discourses of Christ'
More Traditional
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
go to give
smd
the sugar planters
Samuel A. Foot has written: 'An argument in favor of the constitutionality of the general banking law of this state' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Banking law 'An argument, in favor of the constitutionality of the general banking law of this state, delivered before the Supreme Court, at the July term, 1839' -- subject(s): Banking law
Thomas M Nichol has written: 'An argument in favor of honest money and redeemable currency' -- subject(s): Paper money, Greenbacks
It protects workers from unsafe working environments