Want this question answered?
She promised Edmund she would make them a Duke and Duchesses to help rule the country under his authority. She thought this would persuade him to bring them to visit her. She did not understand that Edmund was so angry with his siblings that he did not want her to do anything for them and he was not motivated to bring them.
The Queen kept asking Edmund what he was in Narnia to try and figure out whether he was a threat or ally to her plans. She needed to know Edmund's intentions and allegiances in order to manipulate him effectively and advance her own agenda in Narnia.
If you are asking about Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom of course she is not. She is married to the Duke of Edinburgh who is a man and they have had children as anybody but a complete idiot would be aware!
There would have not have been such a difference. George IV had one daughter who would have become queen in 1830 until her death however, she died in childbirth aged 21 in 1817. Her children and grandchildren would have become the King's and Queen's of Britain and Victoria's 9 children, 42 grandchildren and 37 great- grandchildren would cease to exist.
The best place to see some of his children would be youtube.com. There is a video titled "The Sylvers Hangout" which is spearheaded by J-Syl. (Not sure what birth order he is in). Jeremy Sylvers, who is a handsome dead ringer for his father, the late Edmund. J-Syl also has a channel. Check it Out.
Yes, Queen Elizabeth I is best known as the virgin queen because she was never married or had children. This ment that once she'd died the throne would be given to her cousin who would become 'King James I'. Her actual " virginity " was and has always been a point of speculation.She was desirous of the love and devotion given to Mary, Our Blessed Mother, and sought to style herself after her. She was much loved by many, but not in the way reserved for the Mother of Our Lord and Savior.
Currently, the next royal in line of succession is Queen Elizabeth's second oldest son, Prince Andrew, the Duke of York.
Yes____________I seriously doubt the above, but I am not certain. A 'consort' by definition is the spouse (or partner) of a person, and marriage dissolves at death. So the title 'Consort' would hardly be applicable if King William predeceases her. If she has children at the time of the king's death, she might take the honorific 'Queen Mother', as did the mother of the present Queen, Elizabeth II. If there are no children, there will be a different king and queen, and Kate retaining the position of 'Queen Consort' would be very awkward.
Unfortunately no. The ladies in waiting were sorta at work, tending to the Queen. It would be rude to have children running around a Monarch's bedroom. Because of their title, they were the queen's favorites...they had the money to afford nannies and teachers...the kids were pretty darn occupied with them.
Queen Victoria wasn't very nice to children. her own kids weren't loved by her but loved by nurses and other care takers. The queen only had special times where her children could visit her. i am one to say that i would not enjoy having her as a mother. she was not nice to children.
Elizabeth was known as the virgin queen as we have never heard of her children. in some history sources would show that she did have a child but they never actually survived, she buried them in her garden
6