89, since L means 50, any number to the right of a bigger number means add it to the bigger number. A smaller number to the left of a number means subtract it.
50+10+10+10+(10-1)=89
In todays terms: LXXXIX
No, according to the rules of writing Roman numerals while it is allowable for a single X to preceed L or C two or more numerals should not preceed a numeral of higher value. The correct way to write 89 as a Roman numeral is LXXXIX
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals it is LXXXIX = 89 but in ancient times it would have been LXXXXV = 95
It is: 5 = V as a Roman numeral
This is not a valid roman numeral!
89
In todays terms: LXXXIX
No, according to the rules of writing Roman numerals while it is allowable for a single X to preceed L or C two or more numerals should not preceed a numeral of higher value. The correct way to write 89 as a Roman numeral is LXXXIX
On Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers we get: 89 in roman numerals is written as : LXXXIX where L=50 and X=10 and iX=9.
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals it is LXXXIX = 89 but in ancient times it would have been LXXXXV = 95
This is not a valid roman numeral!
It is: 5 = V as a Roman numeral
The Roman numeral of DXIII is equivalent to 513
LXXVI is the Roman numeral for 76.
You mean Roman Numeral? It is XVI
I/XXI/LXXXIX
LXXXIX.