This quote suggests that prejudice, which is rooted in emotion rather than logic, cannot be dispelled through rational discourse alone. Simply presenting facts and logical arguments may not be effective in changing someone's prejudiced beliefs or attitudes. Emotions and personal experiences often play a larger role in shaping prejudices, making them resistant to logical persuasion.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
That's correct. The validity of an argument depends on both the form of the argument and the truth of the premises. If the premises are false, then even if the argument is logically valid, the conclusion cannot be considered true.
An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.
If a court case is dismissed with prejudice the matter cannot be tried again.
Dismissed without prejudice means the creditor cannot further pursue the debt.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
I think only to a degree. In the end, both characters share in this theme but in different ways. Darcy is proud because of his position in society, and that leads him to scorn anyone outside of his social class at the start. Critic A. Walton Litz commented: "in Pride and Prejudice one cannot equate Darcy with Pride, or Elizabeth with Prejudice; Darcy's pride of place is founded on social prejudice, while Elizabeth's initial prejudice against him is rooted in pride of her own quick perceptions." So Darcy is proud of his position because of social prejudice. Elizabeth at first had prejudice against him because she was proud of her own judgement.
It cannot be removed.
it can be cycled
I can give you several sentences.I cannot stand someone who shows prejudice against another person.Do not prejudice him against you by acting that way.Judging someone by the color of their skin is prejudice.
If a court case is dismissed with prejudice the matter cannot be tried again.
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
There are two types of dismissal: Dismissal WITH Prejudice, and Dismissal WITHOUT Prejudice. WITH prejudice means that the same charges cannot be re-instituted and brought before the court again,. WITHOUT Prejudice means that the charges MAY be re-instituted and brought before court again AFTER the legal insufficiency is cured.
That's correct. The validity of an argument depends on both the form of the argument and the truth of the premises. If the premises are false, then even if the argument is logically valid, the conclusion cannot be considered true.