Ouch?
say fuack u i did not hit your car u biatchaa
First, you shouldn't be cutting people off. Whom ever hit the other car from behind would be at fault.
blame the person who hit first. if that doesnt work then u the first guy who hit the car and the other guys car who hit the other guys car r in deep trouble!
sadly,no. why I say sadly? because it would be funnyer than a stick figure getting hit by a car!!!!
I'm pretty sure the first car that hits and starts the accident pays.
James William Lambert was in the first car crash in 1891. He hit a tree root and went out of control and hit a post.
Mona did, the first A
Who actually gets sued is up to the person that got hit, but ideally the person who hit your car first and not you.
The first person to get hit by a car is not definitively known due to lack of specific historical records. However, the first recorded pedestrian casualty from a car accident occurred in 1896 when Bridget Driscoll was struck and killed by a car in London.
If with "one impact from the last car" you mean that the rear car hit the middle car and then the middle car, as a result, hit the front car, the rear car's insurance would be responsible for all damages. If the middle car first hit the front car and then the rear car hit the middle care, the rear car's insurance would only be responsible for the damages to the middle car. i.e. where was the first impact?
if the car that hit you from behind has insurace its his fault, for failing to leave enough breaking distance, even thought he was hit, u claim from him,, he claims from the car that shoved him and so on
Answer: The vehicle that initiates the collision is at fault.