0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What happens to an organism thats fails to maintain homeostasis?
If your body fails to maintain homeostasis it can result in disease or death.
What is a palindrome for something that fails to work?
Duddud
How do you pass dummy never fails level 51?
shove it up ur but
What happens to your body if the endocrine system fails?
The body might not grow or mature properly
What does it a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
When drawing a conclusion-scientist examine the data to see if it supports or fails to support the hypothesis?
I no
When a researcher fails to reject Null Hypothesis when Null Hypothesis is false he has?
made a Type II error.made a Type II error.made a Type II error.made a Type II error.
When drawing a conclusion scientist examine the data to see if it supports or fails to support the hypothesis?
Drawing Conclusions
What causes a hypothesis to be rejected?
A hypothesis will be rejected if it fails the necessary testing required for it to become a scientific theory.
Is the null hypothesis considered correct until proven otherwise?
No. The null hypothesis is not considered correct. It is an assumption, and hypothesis testing is a consistent meand of determining whether the data is sufficiently strong to say that it may be untrue. The data either supports the alternative hypothesis or it fails to reject it. See examples in links. Also note this quote from Wikipedia: "Statistical hypothesis testing is used to make a decision about whether the data contradicts the null hypothesis: this is called significance testing. A null hypothesis is never proven by such methods, as the absence of evidence against the null hypothesis does not establish it."
When drawing a conclusion scientists examine the data to see if it supports or fails to support the hypothesis?
I no
When can a theory be changed?
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
