0
What effect do you think the courts decision in the dred Scott case on the efforts of many Americans to end slavery?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
It infuriated the Abolitionists, delighted the South, and heightened the tension between the two sides, bringing the war a step closer.
Aliza Upton
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why were people outraged over the Dred Scott case?
The Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case found that African Americans who were held as slaves were not protected under the Constitution, and therefore could not become citizens or sue in court.This decision obviously angered those who opposed slavery because it took away the opportunity for African Americans to preserve their fundamental rights for quite some time. It seemed as if the courts were on the side of the slave states and were on their way to making the prohibition of slavery by the state unconstitutional.However, it is important to note that not everyone was outraged; those in favor of slavery felt that this was an important victory. They felt that their right to own slaves was being protected, and because the courts were not taking away this right, the union could be preserved.
What was a result of dred Scott decision?
Slaves were blocked from bringing lawsuits in courts because they weren't citizens.
What were the effects of the brown decision?
The Brown vs Board of Education was a decision about school. The courts declared government could not provide "equal but separate" educations. Schools had to desegregate.
Abolitionists and how they affected history?
Abolitionists were individuals and groups who advocated for the end of slavery in the United States and other parts of the world. They played a significant role in shaping history by raising awareness about the inhumanity of slavery and promoting the idea of equality. Their tireless efforts led to the abolition of slavery in various countries, including the United States with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and the passage of the 13th Amendment in 1865. Their advocacy continues to inspire movements for social justice and equality today.
In what way did the Kansas issue help Lincoln win the Presidency in 1860?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 with the popular sovereignty portion of the bill was written into the proposal. This portion of the bill was to allow the voters of the movement to decide if slavery would be allowed within the states that were formed because of the Act. Douglas hoped that popular sovereignty would allow democracy to win and he would not have to pick a side on the issues of slavery and slave rights. But indignation fanned out across the territories and the Republican Party gained prominence in the territories of the north and west.
What effect do you think the courts decision in the dred Scott case had on the efforts of many Americans to end slavery?
It infuriated the Abolitionists, delighted the South, and heightened the tension between the two sides, bringing the war a step closer.
Why were southern states governments mostly pleased by the supreme courts died Scott decision?
Southern states governments were pleased by the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slave owners and declared African Americans as non-citizens. This decision protected the institution of slavery and helped maintain the social and economic order in the South.
How did the abolitionists react to the supreme courts decision in the Dred Scott case?
Abolitionists were outraged by the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case, as it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. They saw this decision as a setback to the abolitionist movement and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery.
What role did roger. b taney play in determining whether or not slaves could sue in the courts?
Taney led the U.S. Supreme Court as Chief Justice in the Dred Scott decision.
What was the relationship between The Missouri Compromise and the courts decision in the dred Scott case?
The court ruled that slavery was protected by the constitution, so the Missouri Compromise (which banned slavery North of a certain parallel) was invalid.
Why were people outraged over the Dred Scott case?
The Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case found that African Americans who were held as slaves were not protected under the Constitution, and therefore could not become citizens or sue in court.This decision obviously angered those who opposed slavery because it took away the opportunity for African Americans to preserve their fundamental rights for quite some time. It seemed as if the courts were on the side of the slave states and were on their way to making the prohibition of slavery by the state unconstitutional.However, it is important to note that not everyone was outraged; those in favor of slavery felt that this was an important victory. They felt that their right to own slaves was being protected, and because the courts were not taking away this right, the union could be preserved.
What effect did the supreme courts decision in the dred Scott case have on slavery in the US?
The Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case in 1857 ruled that enslaved individuals were not considered citizens and could not sue in federal court, and also declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. This decision further entrenched the institution of slavery by denying enslaved individuals legal rights and protections, and inflamed tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, ultimately contributing to the outbreak of the Civil War.
What was the final decision of the courts regarding dred Scott?
The final decision of the courts in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) was that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered U.S. citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, allowing slavery to exist in all territories.
What role roger b taney play in determining wheter or not slaves sue in the courts?
Roger B. Taney, as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, delivered the majority opinion in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857, ruling that slaves and their descendants were not US citizens and therefore not entitled to sue in federal courts. This decision further entrenched the institution of slavery and undermined efforts to address the rights of enslaved individuals through the legal system.
Does The term stare decisis refer to a higher courts reversal of a lower courts decision?
no
What is the importance of the doctrine of stare decisis?
Yes it is the basis of the concept that once a court has decided a case lower courts are bound by that decision. This is why the 13th Amendment was needed to outlaw slavery after the Dred Scott decision and why Brown v. Board of Education was considered controversial because it ignored a previous decision that held the opposite.
What role did Roger B Taney play in determining whether or not slaves could use in the courts?
Roger B. Taney was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court who delivered the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford decision in 1857. He ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and therefore could not bring suit in federal court. This decision further entrenched the institution of slavery in the United States.
