Want this question answered?
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
No because a hypothesis s an educated guess..It doesn't need supporting details only you final conclusion needs evidence
To do it right
Experimentation.
The evidence that made you come to that conclusion. Remember that a hypothesis is an educated guess
No. A theory is more certain: it is a hypothesis which has had some supporting evidence.
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
No because a hypothesis s an educated guess..It doesn't need supporting details only you final conclusion needs evidence
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
it was proposed by edward Édouard Roche it's not so real .... no supporting evidence is there for this hypothesis
To support a hypothesis means you agree, and may even give supporting evidence.To refute it means you submit evidence that a hypothesis is incorrect , or you make a cogent and persuasive argument against it.
The evidence that supports wegeners hypothesis is the fossil evidence
The key to a good science story is facts. Do your research and include lots of them as supporting evidence for your hypothesis or topic.
To do it right
Evolution is both: it began as a hypothesis by a scientist who, after some research and thought on the matter, came up with the idea. Since then, that hypothesis has been recognised as a theory, as further evidence came to light supporting the idea and predictions - which were developed based on existing evidence and what the some of the gaps might be - were made, then tested and shown correct.
what are supporting evidence of the whyldam resort?