We would still be relying on coal to a greater extent, though no doubt renewable sources of energy would also be exploited.
it con be as fuel for nuclear power station
No, it is not ethical to use nuclear energy faster than it can be replaced as it can lead to resource depletion and environmental harm. It is important to use nuclear energy sustainably to ensure future generations have access to this energy source.
Nuclear energy is not considered a renewable energy source because it relies on the fission of uranium atoms, which is a finite resource. However, nuclear power plants can help support renewable energy sources by providing a baseload of constant power that can complement intermittent sources like wind and solar.
It depends on what you mean by "Greenest" If you mean in energy consumption it's Paris, France. They use nuclear which is going to be the next resource of energy consumption.
Nuclear energy is a nonrenewable resource because it relies on the extraction and processing of uranium, which is a finite resource. Solar power, hydropower, and wind energy are renewable resources as they rely on naturally replenished sources like sunlight, water, and wind.
Batteries use chemical energy to create voltage to drive current flow. They do not use nuclear energy.
All material uses nuclear energy.
No, uranium is a non-renewable resource. When we have used it all up, there is none left. A renewable resource is something like sunlight, which we can use to generate electricity, and even if we use it all today, it still comes back just as strong tomorrow.Uranium is a nonrenewable resource.
It would technically be a nonrenewable resource, because the elements we use (uranium) will eventually run out.
Because wind energy is reusable and never runs out and does not harm the planet.
All material uses nuclear energy.
The use of nuclear energy