The evidence for there relationship is that they both have back bones and skulls
Evidence of relationships among vertebrate groups includes anatomical similarities, such as homologous structures like limbs, which indicate common ancestry. Molecular data, including DNA and protein comparisons, further support these connections by revealing genetic similarities across species. Fossil records also provide insights into evolutionary transitions, showcasing how different vertebrate groups have evolved over time. Additionally, embryonic development patterns exhibit comparable stages among various vertebrates, reinforcing the idea of shared ancestry.
Vertebrate organisms are organisms that have a spine. The five groups of vertebrate organisms are mammals, birds, amphibians, fish and reptiles.
all vertebrate have a spinal cord.
heterotrophs
Mammals, birds, fish, reptiles, amphibians
Mammals has these 3 groups .
Fish,Reptile,Mammal,Amphibian and bird
The answer is definitely YES, depending at the variables you look at. Evidence indicates that smaller groups are faster at completing tasks than larger groups and that individuals perform better in smaller groups. However evidence has shown that larger groups are better in problem solving than smaller groups. Larger groups are known to be better at fact finding and smaller groups are better at taking action.
Fish- only vertebrate that has gills its whole life Bird- Only vertebrate with feathers Reptile- Dry scaly skin Mammal- only vertebrate that doesn't lay eggs Amphibian- Spend half of their life in water
Scientists classify vertebrate into different groups by the way the animal looks or how big or small it is
The relationship of kinship, groups, and clans is family.
The presece of a vertebrate.