All observational evidence supports Big Bang Cosmology (BBC), and none contradicts it. That the space in our Universe has been expanding (NOT exploding) since about 13 billion years ago is supported by
1) the undeniable fact of Hubble Red Shift. Our Universe is clearly not static, as Einstein (mistakenly) thought.
2) the existence, spectrum, and isotropy of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
3) the ratio of hydrogen to helium in all parts of our Universe.
4) the fact that there are quasars far away from us, but none close to us.
5) no white dwarf stars older than about ten billion years.
6) the ratio of radioactive isotopes to their decay products showing an age of the former of no more than ten billion years.
The evidence for BBC is as solid as the evidence for our Earth going around our Sun. To refuse to believe the former would be as silly as denying the latter.
Discard it all.
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
Well I do now one theory about the universe. It's the big bang theory. The big bang theory is a theory about how the universe was created.Scientist think that a big explosion created the universe.Scientist found lots of evidence that the big bang theory was true.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
The theory of an expanding universe, known as the Big Bang theory, best matches the experimental evidence found by astronomers and physicists. Evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the redshift of distant galaxies support the idea that the universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since.
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
expansion of the universe as shown by the Hubble constant3K universal microwave background radiationetc.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
No, it is a theory (in the scientific sense). This means that it was proposed, tested rigorously and passing strongly, and no evidence to disprove it has yet been found.
No
edwin hubble
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.