0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between direct and indirect evidence?
Direct evidence is something that can prove a fact, evidence that someone has seen or heard. Indirect evidence is different because it relates to facts and does not prove a fact on its own. Indirect evidence is also called circumstantial evidence.
Global warming - fact or fiction?
Of course, global warming is a factual environmental issue. Evidence are the floods around the globe, frequent earthquake experiences, more tsunamis incident occurred and etc -- resulting people to die.
Do scientists base their explanations of the natural world on evidence or belief why?
They have evidence, but if they cant prove something, even with the evidence, it becomes a theroy, or belief. So sometimes it is based on evidence and fact, sometimes on belief.
Does a theory have to be supported by evidence?
NO. take Darwin's theory of evolution for example. there is no real evidence, but it is accepted as fact by most in America today.
Is a scientific theory or law an attempt to explain a pattern observed in the natural world?
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Wha is the difference between relevant and material in evidence?
Relevant Fact is a fact that logically supports a proposition, Material Fact is a fact that relates to any matter in dispute between parties.
What was the issue on case brady v Maryland 1963?
The issue was that Brady due process protected under the 14th amendment were violated due to the fact that the prosecution suppressed evidence from the defense.
Why does the issue of evolution continue to resurface?
In science and the real world evolution is fact and the theory that explains much about this fact is well supported by the evidence. In some peoples lives evidence and even the modern world mean nothing next to their ideological position. This includes religious creationists and secular creationists.
What is presumption of abuse?
Presumptive evidence refers to evidence which tends to prove the existence of one fact by proof of the existence of other facts from which the first may be logically inferred. (e.g.: Two people are locked alone in a room - after they are released Person 'A' is bruised and bloody. It cannot be conclusively proven that person 'A' did not cause his own injuries but, given the circumstances, the PRESUMPTIVE evidence is that Person 'B' assaulted and beat them.)
What is the definition of implied evidence?
That phrase is a fallacy. - Evidence is a fact. If it is only 'implied' then it can not be evidence.
What are the differences between the fact and evidence?
A fact is an objective truth or reality that can be proven or verified. Evidence, on the other hand, is information or data that supports a claim or proposition. Facts are concrete and incontrovertible, while evidence is used to establish the truth of a statement or argument.
When did Quaid-e-Azam say this statement?
Due to the fact that it is logically illogical it makes perfect sense.
What is the difference between direct and indirect evidence?
Direct evidence is something that can prove a fact, evidence that someone has seen or heard. Indirect evidence is different because it relates to facts and does not prove a fact on its own. Indirect evidence is also called circumstantial evidence.
Global warming - fact or fiction?
Of course, global warming is a factual environmental issue. Evidence are the floods around the globe, frequent earthquake experiences, more tsunamis incident occurred and etc -- resulting people to die.
Do corporations issue stocks and bonds?
They do in fact issue stocks and bonds.
A fact can be proved or disproved with?
Evidence
Can i carry life ins on my wife now that are dorioce?
Due to the fact that it is logically illogical it makes perfect sense.
