Want this question answered?
Theory.
Alexander Hamilton did not believe that the Constitution created a strong enough central government, but felt that it was better than the alternative of keeping the Articles of Confederation. There is no evidence that he supported the Constitution for any other reason besides the fact that he felt that it was a better system of government.
It means they had found evidence that to them, supported the existence of God.
Methuselah, a Hebrew at the age of 969. This is of course a legendary story without supporting historical evidence, so it would be prudent to put a decimal point in his age.
No evidence of WMD Should not force democracy on a country who chose their government themselves
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
what are supporting evidence of the whyldam resort?
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
No, to be charged for a crime in the court of law there has to be supporting evidence.
A claim becomes a fact when it can be proven to be true through evidence, data, or supporting documentation that is widely accepted as reliable and accurate by experts in the field. Facts are objective and verifiable, whereas claims are statements that may or may not be supported by evidence.
A supported inference when you draw a conclusion about something using evidence. The evidence is the support for what you have inferred.
"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.
There is no evidence to suggest the Indian national government is supporting terrorism in any way, and much to suggest the opposite. A few local government bodies, which are known for corruption, may be turning a blind eye or even providing minor support to such activities, but these are far from the main and are a tiny minority.
We are never obligated to trust our emotions, even withclear supporting evidence. However, it seems we often do trust our emotions even when that is contrary to clear supporting evidence that we should not.
Supporting evidence