answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What evidence is there that the revolutionary government that supporting the reign of terror also supported human rights?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is scientific evidence supported with theories?

You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.


What is supporting evidence of the whldam resort?

what are supporting evidence of the whyldam resort?


Are biased statements supported by evidence?

No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.


What is a supporting hypothesis?

A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.


A theory is supported by?

A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.


Is it legal to charge someone with a felony if there is no evidence supporting it?

No, to be charged for a crime in the court of law there has to be supporting evidence.


When is a claim a fact?

A claim becomes a fact when it can be proven to be true through evidence, data, or supporting documentation that is widely accepted as reliable and accurate by experts in the field. Facts are objective and verifiable, whereas claims are statements that may or may not be supported by evidence.


What is supported inference?

A supported inference when you draw a conclusion about something using evidence. The evidence is the support for what you have inferred.


Evidence that supports the theory of evolution is called?

"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.


Why is the Indian government supporting the terrorists?

There is no evidence to suggest the Indian national government is supporting terrorism in any way, and much to suggest the opposite. A few local government bodies, which are known for corruption, may be turning a blind eye or even providing minor support to such activities, but these are far from the main and are a tiny minority.


Are we ever obligated to trust our emotions without any clear supporting evidence?

We are never obligated to trust our emotions, even withclear supporting evidence. However, it seems we often do trust our emotions even when that is contrary to clear supporting evidence that we should not.


What does an argument have to have in order to have warrant?

Supporting evidence