0
"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does evidence prove or disprove evolution?
Law and math prove things. Science supports tentative ( more or less ) explanations of natural phenomenon with evidence. The evidence overwhelmingly supports evolutionary theory. PS Evolution itself is a observed and observable fact.
How do scientists use similarities in early development as evidence for evolution?
By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.
Is the theory true that the theory of evolution is supported by a wide range of biological evidence?
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
Can a theory be rejected?
Theories can be changed or rejected if and when the scientific evidence no longer supports the theory.
Darwins theory of evolution by natural selection supports the idea of survival of the?
fittest
What evidence supports the hypothesis that whales evolved from land-dwlling mammals?
Theory of evolution
Does evidence prove or disprove evolution?
Law and math prove things. Science supports tentative ( more or less ) explanations of natural phenomenon with evidence. The evidence overwhelmingly supports evolutionary theory. PS Evolution itself is a observed and observable fact.
How does Josiah Strong show that he supports the theory of evolution?
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
What are current theries that conflict with Darwin's theory what evidence is used to support thses theories?
Intelligent design, Hovind Theory Added: The above are not scientific theories but more ideological assertions in nature. No positive evidence supports either assertion.
Why do people preach evolution when it is just a theory?
Because non-scientists do not understand what a scientific theory actually means. It is not a random guess. Scientific theories are formed based on evidence and experimentation.The scientific community advocates evolution because all the evidence of life on our planet supports the theory.
What are the three kinds of evidence that supports the theory of evolution?
vestgial structures fossils embryology also a big one is that there is a universal genetic code
How do scientists use similarities in early development as evidence for evolution?
By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.
Is the theory true that the theory of evolution is supported by a wide range of biological evidence?
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
What can you concluded about the theory of evolution from the evidence that you have gathered?
That the theory of evolution by natural selection fits the facts of evolution. The theory of evolution by natural selection is based on myriad lives of converging evidence and is the best explanation we have for the adaptive changes leading to speciation in populations of organisms.
What is Alfred Wallace's theory and what evidence did he use to develop it?
Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace proposed the theory called Natural Selection. This theory explained evolution.
Is it true that the theory of evolution is supported by a wide range of biological evidence?
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
How did G A Kerkut define evolution and what did he say about the evidence for it?
AnswerThe evolutionist G A Kerkut defined what is called the 'general theory of Evolution' (GTE) as 'the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.' He continued: 'The evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.'6 G.A. Kerkut, Implications of Evolution (Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1960), p. 157.
