Want this question answered?
The ruins of Mohenjodaro provides evidence to confirm the existence of a system of planning in the city. The streets were broad and straight cutting each other at right angles. The drains were lined with bricks and manholes to facilitate regular cleaning. This speaks highly of the civilization's advanced nature. this was submited by Cody muther f-ing widmer
chinese beleive that their civilization was started in north china plain, obviously like all early civilizations, their first dynasty was xiu dynasty, but there were no clues to say that it is first as there is no evidence
Mesopotamians traded with many. They traded with the Egyptians and the people of the Indus Valley River Civilization. Evidence of Mesopotamians trading with the people of the Indus Valley River Civilization are Indus seals being found in the ruins of Mesopotamia.
The area used to have ample water and a river to irrigate crops. When the climate changed, many people moved. There is other evidence to show that there were some violent times and there was evidence that a significant number of people had leprosy.
if we think according to as told by people there is no evidence about that , if hamunaptra was the real city . so it is difficult to say aany thing.
cause.
The ruins of Mohenjodaro provides evidence to confirm the existence of a system of planning in the city. The streets were broad and straight cutting each other at right angles. The drains were lined with bricks and manholes to facilitate regular cleaning. This speaks highly of the civilization's advanced nature. this was submited by Cody muther f-ing widmer
A sophisticated and technologically advanced urban culture is evidence of an organized government in The Indus Valley Civilization
A single isolated tool or piece of artwork that does not show evidence of settlements, infrastructure, or social complexity would not be considered evidence of a civilization. Artefacts need to be part of a broader context of material culture to demonstrate the existence of a civilization.
The river did not get destroyed. The civilization did. There is no evidence how it did.
Ask a questionLook in the work for evidence that answers that questionTry to find a pattern or idea in the evidenceSummarize the ideas suggested by the evidence improve answer: Pose a question Gather evidence to answer that question Look closely for a pattern in the evidenceSummarize the main idea in your evidence
What are appropriate means for leaving evidence of presence
The bible never actually suggested the age of the earth, certain people have decided using what they believed to be clues to dates to determine that the world is six thousand years old. The evidence disproving their conclusions is great. The fossil and geologic record show that the Earth is billions of years old, and human records in Asia and the Middle East show that civilization existed over six thousand years ago.
Inadmissible Evidence - 1968 is rated/received certificates of: UK:AA USA:Approved (Suggested for Mature Audiences)
the archaeologlat is the careful uncovering of evidence
b/c of fossils
Pluto IS NOT a planet - by definition.