The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
The pieces of evidence Alfred Wegener used to support his theory about continental drift were; Puzzle Fit, Fossil evidence from animals that were once on the same continent, geologic evidence like mountain chains that were connected and now split apart, and ice sheets. Thank you for reading this article and I hoped it answered your question!
what are the theorys of hypodermic needles culmination theory two steo flow theory users and gratifications theory
Continental drift is a concept relating to the movement of the Earth's continents. The proving of the continental drift theory came from evidence found around the world. Foremost, scientists had discovered that similar plants and animal fossils were found in or around different continents, suggesting that they were once joined. The theory of plate tectonics also supported continental drift. If one were to look at a global map, the complementary arrangements between South America and Africa can be easily seen.
formalism
Computer models weren't used. Real computers were used.
hotspots on the ocean floor
The redshift of distant galaxies, which is normally attributed to the Doppler effect.=========================Comment #1:It's important to include in the answer the fact that the question speaks ofhow science is NOT done. Evidence is not used to support theory. Theoryis the attempt to explain existing evidence. THAT's how science works.
The observation that red shifts of distant galaxies gets greater the further away the galaxies are.
The Big Bang theory is the current scientific theory used to explain the origin of the universe.
Hello i am minakshi and the answer is that the evidence collected by each tool is that the cosmic background microwave radiation sent by cosmic background explorer through radars it suggest that there was big bang in the past as big bang theory supports , the hubble space telescope which gives us information about the red shifs of galaxies and the doplers efect, and the analizationof the presence of light elements hydrogen and helium through spectroscope.
In science, a theory is the highest denomination that can be given to an idea. In other words, the big bang theory will never graduate into the big bang law. Instead, laws are used as explanations that govern theories. Example: gravity is a theory which is described by Newtonian laws.
Hello i am minakshi and the answer is that the evidence collected by each tool is that the cosmic background microwave radiation sent by cosmic background explorer through radars it suggest that there was big bang in the past as big bang theory supports , the hubble space telescope which gives us information about the red shifs of galaxies and the doplers efect, and the analizationof the presence of light elements hydrogen and helium through spectroscope.
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
the pulsating universe theory is when the universe expands (the big bang) then contracts (the big crunch) and so on (it's pulsating). according to this theory right now the universe is expanding, but then it will contract
If you browse around this category, you will find several similar questions with replies that answer your query. ==================================== Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Hubble constant (galactic red shifts)3K microwave background radiationlight element/isotope ratios (i.e. hydrogen, deuterium, helium, lithium)
Three important pieces of evidence are:* The redshift of distant galaxies. This means that galaxies are moving away from us. * The percentages of elements and isotopes. This closely matches predictions from theory. * The cosmic background radiation. This, too, closely matches predictions from theory.