The evidenCe that there was mammoths is that years ago many were found frozen and they are an ancestor of elephants
Evidense suggests about 8000 years ago
Its sharp teeth and claws
There is a common misconception that circumstantial evidense is not valid. This is not true. Circumstantial evidense can be very damaging especially when there is a lot of it. It's always nice to have physical/DNA evidense to go along with it, but in some cases it's not necessary. When there is a situation that has coincedense after coincedence the odds of them being random would be very slim. The point being, if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck the chances that it's a zebra is incredibly small.
Elephants are less hairy than mammoths and do not posses such large tusks. Elephants are not extinct, while mammoths are.
The mammoths lived for 100,000000 of years but a mammoths lived for 80 years
#
They are not - mammoths were dinosaurs and are extinct
No mammoths were vegetarians.
Wooly Mammoths are brown.
The Atlantic Ocean
The Mississippi River is surronding The Hanging Gardens of Babylon.
a mansion that a lord lives in and the land surronding it belonging to the lord a mansion that a lord lives in and the land surronding it belonging to the lord