Peter referred to his experience of preaching the gospel to the Gentiles and seeing the Holy Spirit come upon them, affirming their inclusion in the Christian community. This event helped Peter argue for the acceptance of Gentile converts without requiring adherence to all Jewish laws and customs.
If a new pontiff should take the name Peter, his name in Latin would be Petrus Secundus. In every day speech, most people would probably refer to him as "Pope Peter II," or simply, "Pope Peter." If they needed to distinguish between the two Peters in the same conversation or piece of writing, they might refer to the Apostle Peter as "Pope Saint Peter'" or "the first Pope," and to the other as "the present Pope." L'Osservatore Romano, the semi-official newspaper of the Holy See, would refer to the second Pope Peter as "Pietro II" (Pietro due).
It is in the second paragragh of his speech
They refer to him as Arrasoul (messenger) Muhammad (peace be upon him).
No, it is not. The word speech is a noun and may refer to verbal communication, or to a public statement.
Simon Peter.
A:Second Peter does not actually refer to the second-century Epistle of Jude, but does incorporate most of the contents of that epistle.
no
"Purple speech" can refer to language that is politically moderate or bipartisan, combining elements of "blue" (Democratic) and "red" (Republican) viewpoints. It is often associated with finding common ground and seeking compromise in political discussions.
refer to link posted ...
Huh?
Referred is a verb. It's the past tense of refer.
Freedom of speech would allow anyone to refer to anything they want, so long as such reference doesn't fall into any of the exceptions for freedom of speech. You probably need to reword your question.