Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
There are a few downsides to DNA evidence: It has been suggested that the prominence of DNA evidence on TV shows has caused juries to expect irrefutable DNA evidence before convicting someone. This may be a problem if other forms of evidence are ignored. DNA evidence can only be obtained in instances where biological substances are left behind or exchanged. This only occurs in a minority of cases. DNA evidence sometimes only proves that the person was present at the scene - it does not always prove guilt. However, if a person's DNA is found at the scene, this may be perceived as proof that they committed the crime.
Police use DNA evidence to run tests and find out who committed a crime.
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
DNA determines an organism's traits.
Genetic factors(DNA)
size of the DNA
seeding density of the cell quality of transfecting dna ratio of dna to transfectant reagent
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
Rosalind Franklin drew a picture of a DNA molecule and it does not like similar to Watson and Crick's DNA diagram. Rosalind Franklin was smarter than them. It was used to determine the physical structure of DNA.
what does molecular evidence mean
There are a few downsides to DNA evidence: It has been suggested that the prominence of DNA evidence on TV shows has caused juries to expect irrefutable DNA evidence before convicting someone. This may be a problem if other forms of evidence are ignored. DNA evidence can only be obtained in instances where biological substances are left behind or exchanged. This only occurs in a minority of cases. DNA evidence sometimes only proves that the person was present at the scene - it does not always prove guilt. However, if a person's DNA is found at the scene, this may be perceived as proof that they committed the crime.
There are two main factors that cause a mutation in DNA. These factors include: the DNA fails to accurately copy itself and external influence cause a breakdown in the DNA.
Police use DNA evidence to run tests and find out who committed a crime.
DNA evidence says they are not.
DNA