It had two conquering kings - Cyrus the Great and Cambyses, and a succession of consolidating kings starting with Darius the Great.
This not only extended the empire, but also retained it by establishing provincial government to control and defend the different areas, and retaining traditional local government forms which were compatible with the diverse range of peoples, cities and tribes within the empire.
Not that this was unique, the previous Assyrian and Babylonian empires used similar means, but the Persians just did it better, and for over two hundred years were able to maintain control, stability and prosperity until ambitious Alexander the great became the wrecker, turned it into an empire of his own, died and left chaos in his wake.
The previous empires in western Asia - the Assyrian and Babylonian Empires were in decline. Persia, by uniting with Media, had superior unified force and was able to capitalise on this decline, taking over western Asia progressively and then central Asia, meeting no unified opposition. They copied their predecessors by leaving/putting in place local administrations, and supervised these through provincial Persian governors. And the king and his council kept overall direction, and the control of internal and external security.
It's takeover by Alexander the Great.
Being outmanoeuvred by Alexander the Great - who first slaughtered Greeks who were bolstering up the Persian army, then putting an end to the Persian fleet by occupying their bases in the Mediterranean, then capturing the Persian treasury which enabled him to pay his army, and inflicting a final land defeat of the Persian army.
Establishing internal and external security, encouraging prosperity and establishing 20 provinces with Persian governors to promote and progress this.
Retaining local governments under the oversight of Persian privuncial governors who provided internal and external security and kept taxes modest.
military conquest
The previous empires in western Asia - the Assyrian and Babylonian Empires were in decline. Persia, by uniting with Media, had superior unified force and was able to capitalise on this decline, taking over western Asia progressively and then central Asia, meeting no unified opposition. They copied their predecessors by leaving/putting in place local administrations, and supervised these through provincial Persian governors. And the king and his council kept overall direction, and the control of internal and external security.
because europeans were very powerful and we knew the technique of building empires
Specify against whom, when.
An increase in regional interaction. Apex
It's takeover by Alexander the Great.
Expansion of transcontinental trade routes
Expansion of transcontinental trade routes
TradeIron WorkLand ExpansionFarm LandNatural ResourcesA good KingTHESE ARE THE FACTORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What are abiotic and biotic factors of a eastern diamondback rattlesnake
You need to specify which two empires you are referring to if you want to make it possible to answer your question.
Being outmanoeuvred by Alexander the Great - who first slaughtered Greeks who were bolstering up the Persian army, then putting an end to the Persian fleet by occupying their bases in the Mediterranean, then capturing the Persian treasury which enabled him to pay his army, and inflicting a final land defeat of the Persian army.