answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Three? A recent German study has come up with 210 reasons for the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. (Don't worry, I won't list them all) Three of the main reasons were a population shift which caused pressure on the borders. The population shift came about because Germanic tribes were being pushed into Roman territory by Asian tribes. The Roman army at the fall, was weak and apathetic as there was no incentive for a strong army, such as loot and Roman citizenship for the auxiliaries. There was, in addition, a monetary factor, as more money left the empire than was taken in, due to excessive consumerism.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Belief in Philosopha doctrine and dialectics, lead to the downfall of Rome

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Size: it got too big to manage as a whole, and when invaded it could not defend itself adequately.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) says that the Christian religion was not the sole reason for the decline of the Roman Empire, but it contributed to it.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What factors lead to the decline and fall of the Rome empire?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Era of decline upon the collapse of the roman empire is called?

Era of decline upon the collapse of the roman empire is called Fall of Rome


What leadership lessons can be found in the fall of the Roman Empire?

The primary leadership lesson from the fall of the Roman Empire would be to never hire mercenaries to protect your borders. The decline and fall of the Roman empire was a process that took several hundred years. With all deference to the opening sentence, it took a combination of factors that led to the fall of what is termed by many historians as the Western portion of the Roman empire. Certainly leadership was one of the many factors involved with the process, but to quantify it into a single sentence would be incorrect. As an aside, it took Gibbon in the late 1700's 6 full volumes to describe his version of the decline and fall of Rome.


What is the main reason for the decline and fall of the Roman empire and what might have been done to provent it?

There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.


Was the fall of rome a war?

It was a process. The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). Many factors contributed to this. The main one were the invasions by Germanic peoples. This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.


What was the fall of Rome all about?

The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.

Related questions

Era of decline upon the collapse of the roman empire is called?

Era of decline upon the collapse of the roman empire is called Fall of Rome


8 List the economic and military problems that contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire?

The decline of Rome dovetailed with spread of Christianity, and some argue that the rise of the new faith helped contribute to the empire's fall.


Who was the author of history of the decline and fall of the roman empire?

Edward Gibbon wrote The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.


Why was there a fall in ROme?

There was not a fall in Rome. The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.


Who is the author of 'Decline and Fall'?

If you mean The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, it was Edward Gibbon.


What leadership lessons can be found in the fall of the Roman Empire?

The primary leadership lesson from the fall of the Roman Empire would be to never hire mercenaries to protect your borders. The decline and fall of the Roman empire was a process that took several hundred years. With all deference to the opening sentence, it took a combination of factors that led to the fall of what is termed by many historians as the Western portion of the Roman empire. Certainly leadership was one of the many factors involved with the process, but to quantify it into a single sentence would be incorrect. As an aside, it took Gibbon in the late 1700's 6 full volumes to describe his version of the decline and fall of Rome.


What is the main reason for the decline and fall of the Roman empire and what might have been done to provent it?

There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.


Was the fall of rome a war?

It was a process. The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). Many factors contributed to this. The main one were the invasions by Germanic peoples. This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.


Why did the Romans empire decline and then fall?

There were a number of reasons or causes as to why the Roman empire went into decline and fell. They ranged from the economy to the weakened military that couldn't defend the borders, the faulty leadership in government and even to lead poisoning. The best anyone can say is that it was a combination of circumstances and events that brought about the fall of Rome.


Why did the roman empire decline and the fall?

There were a number of reasons or causes as to why the Roman empire went into decline and fell. They ranged from the economy to the weakened military that couldn't defend the borders, the faulty leadership in government and even to lead poisoning. The best anyone can say is that it was a combination of circumstances and events that brought about the fall of Rome.


Who is the author for Deciline and fall of the roman empire?

The author of "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" is Edward Gibbon.


What happened on the fall on rome?

The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.