No
No
Both involve at least a few species dying out because of failure to adapt to the changing environment.
One example of a challenging adaptation for species is surviving in extreme environments with high levels of radiation, such as near nuclear power plants or in highly contaminated areas. Very few species are able to develop the necessary genetic mutations to tolerate such conditions.
Adaptation time can vary greatly depending on the individual and the situation, but it generally takes anywhere from a few days to a few weeks to adapt to a new environment or routine. The process can be influenced by factors such as the person's resilience, previous experiences, and the level of change involved.
I think the two things for population of species if they do not adapt. The answer I think is sea turtles,and salmon.
well the animals adapt to their surroundings when they go there when they do not adapt they tend to find another place to adapt to
Species with genetic variation and diversity are more likely to survive changing environmental conditions because they may have individuals with traits that can adapt to the new conditions. Additionally, species with short reproductive cycles and large population sizes are better able to adapt quickly to changing environments through natural selection.
It's not that they must. The ones that adapt survive. The ones that don't die out.
The theory of evolution posited the theory that species gradually adapt to their environment. The theory claims that humans were originally apes.
extinct
Actually, evolution occurs when the environment changes and forces an organism to adapt. If an organism can't adapt, it goes extinct. This is why adaptable, generalist species often survive longer than specialized ones.
whale