Want this question answered?
As soon as an agreement of purchase and sale has been signed by all parties, and a deposit provided by the purchaser, the contract is in force. The contract could, however, contain one or more "escape" clauses which would void the contract. It depends upon the wording of the contract.
The British mining company agents wanted to obtain mining rights through a contract with the African king Lo Bengula, rather than taking them by force so that the rights could not be taken back or impeached.
the force with which what the contract causes blood pressure
Not if she is on the deed, lease, rental agreement or other form of written contract allowing her to reside in the home.
An expired contract is no longer in force so it cannot be amended. The parties should execute a new contract.An expired contract is no longer in force so it cannot be amended. The parties should execute a new contract.An expired contract is no longer in force so it cannot be amended. The parties should execute a new contract.An expired contract is no longer in force so it cannot be amended. The parties should execute a new contract.
contract is 1. an agreement having 2. force of law. these two are important. but it may also include lawful consideration, free consent of parties, lawful objecctand apties must be competent to contarct . this creats a valid contract. otherwise it may become viod contract or voidable contrac. . . . madeeha_kanwal
its is called an executive agreement
A rate contract sets predefined rates for specific goods or services, usually for a specified period of time. On the other hand, a running contract is an agreement that remains in force until either party decides to terminate it. Running contracts typically do not have preset rates and are more flexible in terms of changes to the scope of work.
No.
Force Account work is work performed under contract that is billed as time and material
Force*displacement
Only if the Mortgagor (borrower) had a signed agreement with the previous mortgage servicer working for the Mortgagee (lender). And then only if the Mortgagor was able to obtain a written agreement from the Mortgagee. Otherwise the Mortgagor is in no position outside a lawsuit to force performance. In most situations, the Mortgagor cannot afford to sue the Mortgagee for enforcement. In many cases the Mortgagor cannot get a written agreement to modify the Trust Deed or Promissory Note. This is my experience as of 12/05/08. Caveat Emptor is still the rule.