Want this question answered?
Yes, under Andrew Jackson the forces of nationalism and sectionalism were in continual conflict.
Major areas of conflict between nationalism and sectionalism in the United States included issues such as states' rights versus federal power, the expansion of slavery into new territories, tariffs and economic policies that favored different regions, and the balance of power between Northern and Southern states in Congress. These conflicts often centered around differing perspectives on how the country should be unified and governed, leading to tensions that ultimately culminated in the Civil War.
The U.S. is the main instigator and continual belligerent in the conflict; it is doing everything in starting and keeping the war going.
The Turkish-Armenian conflict started with the start of Armenian nationalism and there aim for independence.
The continued success of Israel in military conflict.
Muslims and Hindus .
V. A. Tishkov has written: 'Ethnicity, nationalism and conflict in and after the Soviet Union' -- subject(s): Nationalism, Ethnicity, Ethnic relations
Becuase A personm of Germany Had nationalism towards his country and killed Serb which started the conflict between Germany and other countries.
MRT. has written: 'Pakistan and Muslim India. Nationalism in conflict in India'
Hopefully you know what nationalism means, well usually it'll go something like this: American: i think my country is so awesome French: NO MINE IS American: BLEEP YOU French: AMERICA SUCKS BLEEEEEEEP ethnic conflict right there ^_^
Conflict with Great Britain
Conflict with Great Britain