mayor-council
Legislative branch
Interest groups do not perform positive functions for government officials because they stir thoughts and encourages people to battle against what the government officials want to do.
which legislative body is non elective
After passage of laws, the secondary duty of the Legislative Branch is usually considered to be to "advice and consent" on the appointment of Executive and Judicial branch officials not otherwise elected. Impeachment of government officers is also considered to be a strong secondary duty of the Legislative branch.
If the reference is to political power, it is shared between the President and Congress. Of the three branches of government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial) the executive and legislative make and approve laws, and the judicial is there to make sure that they are lawful.
mayor-council
mayor-council
It is the separation of the primary governing functions among three branches of government, becoming the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. This being so that no one group of government officials controlled all the governing functions.
a commission system.
Legislative branch
The judiciary branch. Although mass media could also be controlled by the legislative or executive branch.
There are several divisions in a government agency, each of this division has its unique functions. In some agencies, divisions (with interrelated functions) are under a group or a department which make up one agency. If you are referring to the government per se, then, there are three (3) branches; 1. executive (president, vice president and other executive officials) 2. legislative (the house of representatives and the senate) 3. judicial (supreme court and the lower courts)
Interest groups do not perform positive functions for government officials because they stir thoughts and encourages people to battle against what the government officials want to do.
Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926), was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body.Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the powers that a President of the United States has to remove certain executive officials of a "quasi-legislative," "quasi-judicial" administrative body created by Congress, for purely political reasons and without the consent of Congress.In Myers, the ruling pertained to officials of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH. The President is the head of the Executive Branch and, in effect, all Executive Branch officials come under his direct authority and control.In Humphreys, the ruling pertained to officials of ADMINISTRATIVE bodies of certain agencies CREATED BY CONGRESS. Congress is the LEGISLATIVE BRANCH of Government. The "officials' referred to in Humphrey are appointed by Congressional action and not by the President.THUS: The Myers case refers to employees of the Executive Branch of government and the Humphrey case refers to employees of the Legislative Branch of government.
There is no comparison between the two.For one thing the police are part of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH of government and the elected officials are part of the LEGISLATIVE BRANCH.For another thing: Members of the LEGISLATIVE BRANCH do not "manage" the day-to-day operation of EXECUTIVE BRANCH agencies. If they effect them at all is only by the laws that they pass.
Executive Branch. If you get all of the Agriculture, EPA, IRS, and other agencies that is controlled under the executive branch, then you might now how many people are employed compared to legislative that holds about 500 officials.
State Representatives