Nothing
He lived in Scotland. But I am NOT proud of what he did! He was not good.
He killed his family just to take over the throne such as his nephew, then stole land from the barons (lords) and made them outlaws ( the story of Robin Hood was based on this). He even signed the Magna Carta and then broke its rule. and killed people with bare hands. the end
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
John wasn't a bad king... he just wasn't the best off 'em all! He made everyone pay extremely high taxes and chucked all of the monks out, including the blind and crippled. John fell out with the pope allot and used to steal things from the churches, but eventually John gave in to the pope and they were like bezzy mates :) Also John used to make elderly widows pay a £3000 pound fine or he would make them remarry! But John did allot of good and hardworking things: He had a battle for his crown and won! On rare occasions, John would organise a large meal for poor people who haven't ate large meals a while King John won battles against Wales, Scotland and England. He also made the navy(England's fighting ships) very strong. John made sure that trials in courts were fairer and made England richer. :)
what are the bad things king james the 1st did
he never left his land...he always stayed where he thought he should. He signed the magna carta. John stopped the Welsh and Scotts from attacking England.
He visited the poor, tried to get farm land for his people and he helped them.
He lived in Scotland. But I am NOT proud of what he did! He was not good.
He killed his family just to take over the throne such as his nephew, then stole land from the barons (lords) and made them outlaws ( the story of Robin Hood was based on this). He even signed the Magna Carta and then broke its rule. and killed people with bare hands. the end
my friend it is king henry because king john is a good king in them days
A simple Wikipedia search would've been easier. No, he got excomunicated. That is if you are talking about the King John of England. As there are ones of Bohemia, Denmark, Poland, Portugal, and Scotland. You might want to specify next time.
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
king john had 2 sons for heres and kept clean
John wasn't a bad king... he just wasn't the best off 'em all! He made everyone pay extremely high taxes and chucked all of the monks out, including the blind and crippled. John fell out with the pope allot and used to steal things from the churches, but eventually John gave in to the pope and they were like bezzy mates :) Also John used to make elderly widows pay a £3000 pound fine or he would make them remarry! But John did allot of good and hardworking things: He had a battle for his crown and won! On rare occasions, John would organise a large meal for poor people who haven't ate large meals a while King John won battles against Wales, Scotland and England. He also made the navy(England's fighting ships) very strong. John made sure that trials in courts were fairer and made England richer. :)
King john was good because he agreed to the Magna Carta after he had done all of his bad things! He was Good because:He promised to stop unfair taxesHe didn't interfere with the church!He wouldn't imprison people without a trialHe fed over 1000 paupers every year!That's all that is left to say about king john! I hope you have learnt something from this piece of writing! Thank you
what are the bad things king james the 1st did
John Logie Baird was born in Scotland. John Baird did however live a good portion of his life in England.