They all went back to there normal life.
The PoW (Prisoners of War) were kept either in PoW Camps or in some Concentration Camps such as Auschwitz.
1
POW camps for Communist (NVA/VC) Prisoners of War were operated by the South Vietnamese Government: See website: Prisoner-of-war Camps.
Possibly the POW Camp in Bataan, as that was one of the first POW camps for the allies, and one of the first experiences for Japanese forces on the handling of Prisoners of War.
It is considered a duty for men of honor.
Australian POWs were treated as appallingly as other whites in Japanese camps. They were used as slave labour.
The living conditions of the POW camps in Canada were said to be very good. The camps were in better condition than the army barracks. Canada has had more than 33,798 prisoners of war.
it was a prison of war camp a camp were they took members of army from there rivals and kept them prisoners
Yes. The inmates consisted of prisoners taken by British troops, usually from the European mainland.
There were at least 450 people
4% of POW's in German camps about 5000 27% of POW's in Japanese camps about 125,000
because it would be unreasonable economically to take care of all the prisoners in ethical ways. POW camps are a way for a country to take prisoners and handle them in accordance with accepted "rules of war." America had POW camps for Japanese Americans (even those born here) because "they might be sympathizers with the enemy". This was wrong in oh so many ways. But the heart of the matter is, POW camps were designed to reduce economic costs and increase security of the land the enemy was invading. Alternatives ARE few: kill everyone, wounded or not, surrendering or not and take no prisoners, or don't fight.