No. The houses that were burnt down were built of wood and were tightly packed together. The Tower of London is built of stone and is surrounded by a moat.
No, because they are sited outside of the area that was burned down. However they did burn down in the 19th century.
The Americans burned down the Parliament building on October 31st in 2012
38,200 were destroyed in the fire.
The Great Fire of London was in 1666 and London Fire Brigade didn't exist then.
The negatives of the Great Fire Of London was that many people died or got injured. It also burned down many houses.
At the time of the Great Fire, most of the houses were built of wood enabling the fire to spread rapidly. When the city was rebuilt, they used stone to build the houses which obviously wouldn't burn so easily.
According to the records nobody died, but as 13,200 houses were destroyed, that may not be true.
The Great Fire of London in 1666.
It destroyed 13000 houses in what was then Central London.
the great fire of London started in a bakery and then spread on the houses. Because the houses were made of wood and straw, it made it easier to burn. Fuel- the houses
The Great Fire of London happend in 1666 from September 2nd to September 5th. Wikipedia has alot of very good information this.
The wooden houses were the main fuel for the fire.
The Black Death The Great Fire of London stuff like that
13,000 houses and 89 churches were destroyed in the great fire of London.
to never make wooden houses
i don't really know but i think somebody else took the throne 1660, it was Charles Stuart's son.
The fire destroyed 13,200 houses, 87 churches, 1 cathedral and left an estimated 70,000 people homeless.
The Great Fire of London in 1666 spread rapidly because the wooden houses were packed close together and it had been a particularly dry summer.
13,200 houses were destroyed making 70,000 people homeless.
people died and houses burnt and i just fell over