The losses on both sides were so high that the battle was recorded as the bloodiest day of the Civil War.
The losses on both sides were so high that the battle was recorded as the bloodiest day of the Civil War.
Antietam did not swing on any crucial decisions. It happened because McClellan had discovered by chance that Lee's divisions were widely separated, and believed he could destroy them piecemeal. Lee then had to concentrate his forces, and fight before he was ready. If you're asking what would have happened if Lee had won, the answer is that Britain would have granted official recognition to the Confederacy and sent military aid. History might then have been very different.
No, the movie was not an accurate portrayal of the events that happened in Gallipoli but rather a portrayal of the values and morals of the soldiers that fought in Gaillipoli.
You are asking for 200 years of history. It would help if you gave a time period so we can give you a more accurate answer.
In pure military assessments of the Battle of Antietam, military historians see the battle as being one of inconclusive results. When military experts sweep away all the political ramifications of that battle, they see an inept and numerically superior Union army, Yes, Lee had to retreat, in fact no matter what happened in Sharpsburg, Lee did not have enough men or supplies to stay in Maryland. Military minded people say that Lee's other objectives were met, thereby, in a sense, nullify the results at Antietam. Militarists point out that Lee's invasion prevented a combined effort by McClellan and General John Pope to advance on Richmond. Lee's positions before and after Antietam transferred all military operations to northern Virginia. Based on Southern newspapers, the Southern public was not discouraged by the setback in Maryland. Also, the Army of Northern Virginia remained a force that within seven weeks doubled its size.With all the above said, Antietam was a political victory for Lincoln and the Union. Lincoln was then resolved to release his first emancipation proclamation.
The losses on both sides were so high that the battle was recorded as the bloodiest day of the Civil War.
They weather and erode, forming sediments.
Battle of Antietam, 23000 casualties, in MD. Sept 1862
He was simplywaiting for a Union victory. It happened at Antietam (Sharpsburg).
All of the land battles except Antietam and Gettysburg happened on Southern soil.
earth cooled suffciently
The Battle Happened because the Southerners were going to attack the Northern capital Washington, D.C.
It happened twice - Antietam (Sept. 62) and Gettysburg (July 63)
The play 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum' is historically accurate, in the way that it is based on the comedies/farces of the ancient Roman playwright, Plautus.
Antietam did not swing on any crucial decisions. It happened because McClellan had discovered by chance that Lee's divisions were widely separated, and believed he could destroy them piecemeal. Lee then had to concentrate his forces, and fight before he was ready. If you're asking what would have happened if Lee had won, the answer is that Britain would have granted official recognition to the Confederacy and sent military aid. History might then have been very different.
No, the movie was not an accurate portrayal of the events that happened in Gallipoli but rather a portrayal of the values and morals of the soldiers that fought in Gaillipoli.
Several hundred thousand things happened in the science community between those periods. New quantum particles were discovered, new viruses and vaccinations, new theories on star and planet formations, etc.