Want this question answered?
a crime committed involving fire
It depends on crime and the verdict reached.
Hitler and the Nazis were responsible for the Holocaust.
he was never charge with the crime
By signing the declaration, the founding fathers were comitting treason.
Over time, the Anglo-Saxon methods at dealing with crime improved. Once common law was established, and similar cases had happened before, then it was easier to convict the criminals.
The Anglo-Saxon methods were ineffective because they were very lenient on crime, and they used common law to punish them. In other words, there had to be similar incidents prior to the crime of the person that was being convicted in order for the punishment to be effective.
They would have all the people who came into jail and what crime they committed and where it happened.
Yes. A crime happened. If the other person tried to kill you, then the other person is responsible for the crime even though you did the killing. If it was simply a fight and you suddenly decided to kill the other guy, then you committed a crime.
a crime committed involving fire
depends what crime - and when crime committed.
It is the place where the crime or alleged crime was believed to have been committed.
If you committed the same offense, seperately, in each state, you can be charged with each separate crime. You cannot be tried in IL for a crime committed in IN, and conversely, you cannot be tried in IN for a crime committed in IL.
The perpetrator of a crime is the person who actually committed the crime. A suspect may or may not have committed the crime. A suspect has not been confirmed as being the perpetrator.
It depends on the laws in the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed. There is what is called a "statute of limitations" in some jurisdictions for some crimes that prevents prosecution after the specified period of time.
It means the type of crime committed.
Any crime committed by a juvenile or "teen"