0
forshadowing.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Carlson's Luger was taken by George and used to shoot Lennie at the end of the novel "Of Mice and Men" by John Steinbeck. George used the gun as a merciful way to prevent Lennie from suffering a worse fate at the hands of others.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoMetaphors.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What gun does Carlson own in Of Mice And Men?
In Of Mice and Men, it is stated that Carlson owns a Luger.
Where did the gun come from in the book mice and men?
Out of his pants ;)
George steals what from Carlson in of mice of men?
His gun
What does carlson say he has 'Of Mice and Men'?
In "Of Mice and Men," Carlson says he has a Luger pistol.
What was carlsons position at the ranch in 'Of Mice and Men'?
Carlson's position at the ranch in "Of Mice and Men" was a ranch worker. He was a no-nonsense, practical man who was known for his toughness and lack of sentimentality. He owned the Luger pistol that he later used to shoot Candy's dog.
What was Of Mice and Men first called?
"Of Mice and Men" was first published under the same title in 1937.
When does George get the gun?
George gets the gun in Chapter 2 of the book "Of Mice and Men" after it is given to him by Candy, who offers to join George and Lennie in their dream of owning a farm.
How is the movie mice of men a flashback?
Mike orcutt is why the flashback happened.
Who actually took Carlson's gun in 'Of Mice and Men'?
George is the one who took Carlson's gun in 'Of Mice and Men'. He used it to shoot Lennie, as a mercy killing, to spare him from a more brutal death at the hands of the other ranch workers.
What influenced 'Of Mice and Men'?
A similar event that happened to John Steinbeck back in 1942.
Is it mice and men or Of Mice and Men?
Ranch
How does Georges version of what happened contradict what actually happened?
Georges's version of events differs from what actually happened by misrepresenting certain key details, omitting relevant information, or giving a biased perspective that skews the truth. This contradiction can create misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the true sequence of events.
