Want this question answered?
Because they didnt want to tell the serfs that they were slaves and would want to promise them freedom in a way that is really hard to active because they knew that they couldnt do it
she didnt have a kid
They don't get paid for it so we cant call it job anyway!
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
The serf's master was a lord. This was not always a title with a specific rank attached to it, so it could have applied to a knight, or even a person of no title at all. The person who organized serfs was often called a reeve. This person was appointed by the lord or elected by the serfs with the lords final approval, depending on the traditions at the particular manor. The reeve was often a serf himself, and acted as the representative of the other serfs to the lord, and of the lord to the other serfs. His job also included assignment of jobs and land.
he didnt this never ever happened you cant proove it scalywags!
they would get punished
A knights most important job was to protect the serfs of the village.
He didnt have a job. He was in collage. He didnt have a job. He was in collage.
no it does not have an effect cuz that happened to me before.
They didnt have stockpiles of extra food; they were dependent on the recent harvest.
* Well, yes, serfs were the same as villiens. They did the same jobs. Working for the land and working for their lord. But, they didnt have to do all the hard work like villiens did. So therefore, i changed my anwser. Villiens were not serfs.. at least i dont think so.......??????
there job was to help clean up with maids i think im not so shue
Because they didnt want to tell the serfs that they were slaves and would want to promise them freedom in a way that is really hard to active because they knew that they couldnt do it
she didnt have a kid
no her parents didnt have a job
They don't get paid for it so we cant call it job anyway!