answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

* Well, yes, serfs were the same as villiens. They did the same jobs. Working for the land and working for their lord. But, they didnt have to do all the hard work like villiens did. So therefore, i changed my anwser. Villiens were not serfs.. at least i dont think so.......??????

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Were villeins the same as serfs?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Are the serfs villeins and peasants the same class in the feudelism class structure?

No, serfs, villeins, and peasants were not the same class in the feudal class structure. Serfs were laborers tied to the land, villeins were a type of unfree peasant with certain obligations to the lord, and peasants were more of a broad category of rural laborers that included both serfs and freemen.


What do you call the medieval gathering the lords crops?

serfs or villeins


What are Feudal serfs tied to the earth called?

They're called villeins or serfs, they both have the same meanings. A serf or villein is an un-free peasant bound to a particular land and owned by their Feudal lord.


What is another name for the kings people besides followers and peasants?

Serfs, peasants, villeins.


Who is a peasant who is tied to the land?

They were known as serfs.


How did villeins treat their animals?

Villeins children what did they do


Why were some peasants freemen and the others villeins?

The villains were considered freemen among the serfs, but a subject under the king Both villains and serfs exchanged manual labor on the manors grounds for produce and rent. These conditions continued into the 15th century when tenure and free labor gained prominence.


What people were in the same level as the serf in medieval times?

Serfs were on about the same social level as villeins and cottars. Serfs were above slaves, if any existed in the place where the serfs lived. Serfs were not bought or sold, but they were not free to leave the land on which they lived. They were mostly agricultural workers and unusually had plots of land assigned to them to farm for their own benefit. Villeins were like serfs, but did not have plots of land assigned to them. Cottars were apparently like serfs except that they were not bound to the land and had the option of moving away, which would have been a rather risky thing to do since it would leave them without home or income, unless they had some other arrangement. The nature of the cottar is not clearly understood, however. Above the serf, but not necessarily much above, were freemen, who were not bound to the land. Most of these people worked in agriculture, but they had other types of work to do. The simpler non agricultural chores of life were performed largely by serfs. These things included cleaning, helping cooks, lugging bricks for masons, digging ditches, washing and repairing clothes, and so on. They might have included such work as weaving, baking, cooking, depending on circumstances. Clearly there were hierarchies within job types. Please see the link below.


Peasents who were bound to a manor?

Peasants who were bound to a manor were known as serfs or villeins. They were required to work the land and pay dues to the lord of the manor in exchange for protection and the right to live on the land. Serfs were not free to leave the manor without the lord's permission.


Could villeins live comfortably?

No villeins couldn't live very comfortably.


What is the same about serfs and lords?

Nothing except they are both people. The lords owned the serfs who were slaves.


What did the lord give to the villeins in return for all the hard work?

money for the villeins daughter's marriage