The police often keep the car and sell it at auction.
Then next thing you know there are drugs in your car. Unless someone steals them. Or your car will be checked and you will have a lot of answering too do!
It get impounded.
yes
The police officers now are responsible for keeping that car since that car was found with drugs inside it.Added: It depends on WHY the vehicle was seized. If it was seized only for evidence, you should be able to get it back after the court action has been completed.On the other hand - if the vehicle was seized under the authority of federal law, it is gone forever and the agency that seized it will get it, if they want it. If not it may be sent to auction and the agency that seized it will get the proceeds of the sale.
Each case is different. Discuss this with your attorney.
I don't think they'll buy that one.
Everyone that was in the car is arrested unless someone said that the drug was theirs or it belongs to them then only they are arrested.
Probably not, but there is a good possibility that you'll be watched.
I can only speak for NY. If drugs (narcotics) are found in a vehicle and noone claims them then everyone in the vehicle can be charged with possession. If it is marijuana, then only the driver can be charged with possession. That is according to penal law in NY state. Who owns the car? Then ,who was in the car? Common sense, last person there, name on the car, Hello!
You should discuss this with an attorney, but the investigation will likely center on the person it was repossessed from.
i believe if no one else is in the car at the time except you, then you will be charged, but if there are multiple people in the car and you own the car and someone has the drugs and stash them someone, in most cases whereever it is found by that's who is charged, say the passenger stashes the drugs under their seat, the passenger would be charged but if you knew he had the drugs and the officer finds it, then both parties would be charged, with , withholding drugs whether it was yours or not, but it depends on the officer, whether they're more understanding, and find more evidence to lead to a direct source, i believe The driver of a vehicle is responsible for all things in the vehicle and all things the vehicle does. The owner is also responsible.
The fact that the police did not seize the coat will not have any bearing on the outcome of the case. Using an analogy, if the drugs were found on the dashboard of the car, the police would not also seize the dashboard to prove the case. Many drug cases revolve around drugs being located in articles of clothing. It would not be reasonable for the police to also seize the clothing in these cases (it would also be inappropriate in some cases, ie underwear, bras, ect).
Anti-bacterial gets rid of bacteria, anti-fungals get rid of fungus, and anti-parasitic gets rid of parasites.
The sentence "He gets farts in the car" should be written like this. "He gets in the car and farts" or "He farts in the car