Want this question answered?
see links
no
no
Usually the case will be closed and the custodial parent will have to re-file in the state where she/he resides.
The custodial parent is legally free to relocate. This is because the noncustodial parent's argument as to why the relocation should not happen has not be presented to the court in time for the hearing and therefore the court will grant the custodial parent's application to relocate unopposed.
He needs to file a modification
Until a change of custody order, the custodial parent has the decision power in the matter, however it can be considered child abandonment.
He/she can lose custody all together. The non-custodial parent needs to file a motion for contempt of a court order. If the custodial parent continues to violate the order they could eventually lose custody.
Leaves them permanently or in violation of court ordered custody/visitation time? In either circumstances, the non-custodial parent may file an action for contempt of court against the custodial parent and/or file for custody/visitation modification based on the same.
for what?
Yes! Why would you want to keep that from the "custodial parent" anyway?
No. The parent with custodial rights is totally liable especially since the child was living with you while it happened.AnswerThat depends on several factors such as why the coverage was canceled, when it was canceled, who allowed the child to drive the car, whether the issue is addressed in the separation agreement, etc. If the custodial parent canceled insurance coverage for a reason and the non-custodial parent allowed the child to drive in spite of the cancellation, the non-custodial parent may be liable. If the child wrecked a car and as a result the custodial parent canceled the insurance coverage so they could no longer drive, the non-custodial parent would be liable if they continue to allow the child to operate a vehicle.