Want this question answered?
The prisoner decided to waive his right to a trial.
You either were found not guilty and why would you want to waive that or it was dismissed with prejudice and you do not want to waive that either. If convicted a new trial would only occur if they was a problem with the old trial and Double Jeopardy would not apply
You would basically be agreeing to voluntarily go to the state that is charging you. You would let them pick you up or perhaps you can drive to the state to surrender.
Yes they do.Added: Not necessarily - juveniles whose cases are being heard in juvenile court do not have that option. Also, defendants may waive a jury trial and request a "bench trial" instead.
If one is on trial for a criminal offense, they are entitled to a trial by jury, but can waive this and be tried just by a judge.
There are foms to waive speedy trial, but there are no forms necessary to request it. Speedy trial is understood to always exist because it is guaranteed in the Constitution.
A trial that has no jury is called a bench trial. A defendant may choose to waive his right to a jury trial and have his case heard and decided by a judge only. See the link below for a simple description of this type of trial.
No, it has nothing to do with the right to a speedy trial. It refers to the waiver of acceptance of a unanimous jury verdict in a case at trial.
"waive" ... Yes, with the court's permission. She cannot waive support due the State as reimbursement for assistance provided.
I think you might be referring to a document known as a "Waiver," although in the circumstance you cite, I'm not sure it would be legally enforceable.
The court can waive it if there is good cause. Without that waiver from the court, you have to wait out the 30 days.
If they have already been arraigned there is no statutory time limit for the next step except for the "speedy trial" rule, and many (most?) defense attorneys routinely waive this time limit in order to better prepare their cases.