0
What else can I help you with?
A historian uses the comparative method to?
A historian uses the comparative method to analyze similarities and differences between different historical events, societies, or cultures. This approach helps historians gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influenced these events and how they shaped the course of history. By comparing different cases, historians can identify patterns, trends, and variations that contribute to a more comprehensive interpretation of historical events.
How might a micro historian and a comparative historian use different methods to study great depression?
A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph several cities’ unemployment levels throughout the Great Depression.
What is comparative method?
more descriptive
What is descriptive-comparative method?
more descriptive
What is the comparative and superlative forms of the word satisfactory?
comparative= uses more, better , etc. superlative = uses most, best, etc.
What is the systematic method of studying politics?
historical method observational method expermental method
What is the comparative of handsome?
Because handsome is an adjective with two syllables and does not end in a 'y,' the comparative for the word uses more. The comparative for handsome is more handsome.
What does comparative method means?
to identify similarities and differences and to explain them
Who uses the scientific method?
math uses the scientific method
What is relative performance appraisal method?
According to SHRM, the comparative method is when the appraiser directly compares the performance of each employee with that of others. Some comparative methods are Ranking, Paired Comparison and Forced Distribution.
What might a micro historian and a comparative historian use different methods to study a topic?
A micro historian might focus on studying specific individuals, events, or small-scale phenomena in great detail, often relying on close analysis of primary sources. In contrast, a comparative historian may study broader patterns or themes across different regions or periods, comparing similarities and differences to draw larger conclusions. Both approaches provide valuable insights but emphasize different levels of analysis and breadth of study.
A historian who compares the expansion of political system to the expansion of economic system is organizing history by?
Comparative economic systems is the subfield of economics dealing with the comparative study of different systems of economic organization, such as capitalism, socialism, feudalism and the mixed economy.A historian who compares the expansion of political system to the expansion of economic system is organizing history by theme.
